I suggest a scientific approach to this issue. Ask 1000 Jewish men in various countries if they have negative or perhaps positive opinion about their circumcision. If the answer is 100 % on behalf of circumcision we can cease the dispute. But if for example 40-50 % of the answers are against circumcision, we have to think seriously the issue. Perhaps KGS and Kumitonttu already have to show this type of studies.
I suggest a scientific approach to this issue. Ask 1000 Jewish men in various countries if they have negative or perhaps positive opinion about their circumcision. If the answer is 100 % on behalf of circumcision we can cease the dispute. But if for example 40-50 % of the answers are against circumcision, we have to think seriously the issue. Perhaps KGS and Kumitonttu already have to show this type of studies.
Kommentoin tuolla TT:n sivulla näkemystäsi, mutta lyhyesti viittaan tässä Tsekin presidentin puheeseen, jonka suomensin blogiini.
VastaaPoistaKiitos kommentista. Vastasin siihen.
VastaaPoistaI suggest a scientific approach to this issue. Ask 1000 Jewish men in various countries if they have negative or perhaps positive opinion about their circumcision.
VastaaPoistaIf the answer is 100 % on behalf of circumcision we can cease the dispute.
But if for example 40-50 % of the answers are against circumcision, we have to think seriously the issue.
Perhaps KGS and Kumitonttu already have to show this type of studies.
I suggest a scientific approach to this issue. Ask 1000 Jewish men in various countries if they have negative or perhaps positive opinion about their circumcision.
VastaaPoistaIf the answer is 100 % on behalf of circumcision we can cease the dispute.
But if for example 40-50 % of the answers are against circumcision, we have to think seriously the issue.
Perhaps KGS and Kumitonttu already have to show this type of studies.